specificity question...

From: Julie Bertout <julie.bertout@ibl.fr>
Date: Fri Apr 18 2008 - 05:59:48 EDT
Hello,
I know that staining specificity and isotype controls are currently 
discussed on this mailing list but I still have a question...

A phD student is working on adherent cell line (SKNMC, human 
neuroblastoma cell line (HTB10)). he detached them using EDTA. He wants 
to study a protein expression following shRNA treatment.

I attached the results because we need help for results interpretation...

Here is the problem we encounter :
He is doing a 2 steps staining.
- he has no aspecific staining due to his secondary antibody.
- he can see 2 peaks with his isotype control : I can't explain it... 
What does this mean??
- the fluorescence of his antibody-specific staining is above the one 
obtained with his isotype control but can we consider that it is 
specific and compare the results obtained in the different conditions? 
When you look at the histograms, is it possible to conclude that we 
really have less protein following the shRNA treatment compared to the 
control-shRNA?

I am puzzled...

(You can also give me your advice on the FS/SS dotplot, I think it would 
be better to increase his FS settings)

Thank you very much for your help.

Julie Bertout
Flow cytometry core
Institut Pasteur de Lille
France


This attachment - 'specific staining.pdf' -  570.25 KBytes - can be viewed at
http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/MD-parts/b03bd15e65accb293fe142dff5072c9f931a2f6a.pdf 
Received on Fri Apr 18 14:18:00 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST