RE: Suggestion (Identities of responders in summaries)

I agree strongly with Mario - it brushes on the copyright issue too (I
pretty much waive my copyright when sending to a web list, but expect
private communications to be private - it's annoying when a private message
ends up being replied to on a list, or pasted in a summary and it breaks
copyright - not that anyone's likely to sue of course).

Nice that this thread has an informative title now by the way.

Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: marioroederer@gmail.com [mailto:marioroederer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Mario Roederer
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 10:47 AM
To: cyto-inbox
Subject: Re: Suggestion (Identities of responders in summaries)

I absolutely disagree with posting the identity of responders when
posting summaries of replies.  When I respond privately to someone's
query, I may put in information that is not for general distribution.
I always consider emails that people send directly to me to be
private, and I would not disclose their identity without their
permission.

If summaries include attribution then a lot of people will be
discouraged from providing advice; I know that I will be far more
reticent to provide candid advice when responding in private.

mr


On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Jones, Norman (CDPH-CID-DCDC-VRDL)
<Norman.Jones@cdph.ca.gov> wrote:
>
>
> I might add that it would be nice if people would include the identity of
> the responders when posting summaries.
>
> Cheers,
> Norm
>
> Norman Jones
> CDPH/VRDL
> 850 Marina Bay Parkway
> Richmond, CA 94804
> T:  (510) 307-8527
> F:  (510) 307-8601
> C:  (510) 207-1492
> E:  Norman.Jones@cdph.ca.gov

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1352 - Release Date: 3/31/2008
10:13 AM

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1352 - Release Date: 3/31/2008
10:13 AM