As Mario says - but first make sure that the voltages are set so that all of your cells are on scale and that it’s a useful part of the scale (if you’re using beads that’ll be quite likely) , and don’t worry that the highly autofluorescent cells are offset from the origin of the plot. Remember that if you change your pmt settings for each cell type (as I’ve seen done a few times), the relative level of expression of markers becomes hard to compare between types (if you drop the voltage so that autofluorescent cells that would appear in the second decade now appear in the first decade of a log scale, you drop the amplification of positive signal by a factor of ten too). It may seem obvious (or maybe it doesn’t), but “correcting” for autofluorescence of (say) cultured lymphocytes by dropping PMT voltage so that their negatives appear in the same place as unstimulated lymphocytes, then comparing the MFI due to an antigen (whichever M you care to choose) on unstimulated and cultured cells would make it look as though the cultured cells had downregulated the expression of the marker when in fact you’d just turned down the amplification. I’ve seen people do this and also try to compare MHC levels on monocytes and lymphocytes in PBMC after “correcting” for autofluorescence too – hence the overlong rant :) Ray Ray Hicks Cytek Development Inc http://www.cytekdev.com tel: +44 (0)208 1337 968 skype: ray.hicks.cytek From: Mario Roederer [mailto:roederer@drmr.com] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:52 PM To: cyto-inbox Subject: [SPAM-LOW] Re: Conpensation on mixed cell types Since compensation is intrinsic to the fluorochrome and independent of autofluroescence, it doesn't matter what kind of cells you are analyzing when it comes to compensation. Just set your comps based on beads (or single-stained cells), that for each color, the positive and negative controls have the same background (autofluorescence) -- for example, unstained beads. And make sure that your comp control is brighter than any sample. Now your compensation is properly set. If you are seeing events that appear undercompensated, then perhaps this is due to very highly-autofluorescent cells--since autofluorescence has a different spectrum than fluorochromes, it will tend to appear on a correlated (diagonal) line in distributions. mr On Feb 25, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Rossi Ralph wrote: Dear All, does anyone have any suggestions on how best to perform compensation on samples with different cell types .In particular cell types with very different levels autofluorescence ? thanks Regards Ralph Rossi Flow Facility Manager Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne , Australia Email: HYPERLINK "mailto:ralph.rossi@petermac.org"ralph.rossi@petermac.org Ph 96563747 , 96561955 This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only to be read or used by the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, distribution, disclosure or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this email (including any attachments) are not waived or lost by reason of its mistaken delivery to you. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify us immediately by telephone or email. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre provides no guarantee that this transmission is free of virus or that it has not been intercepted or altered and will not be liable for any delay in its receipt. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.0/1296 - Release Date: 2/24/2008 12:19 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.0/1296 - Release Date: 2/24/2008 12:19 PMReceived on Wed Feb 27 15:18:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST