Maciej Simm wrote: > > if I ask google scholar: > > "MFI *median* fluorescence intensity" > > vs > > "MFI *mean* fluorescence intensity" > > I get 3,470 vs 16,100 hits, respectively. So which is it - mean or > median fluorescence intensity? > Neither or both. The majority doesn't, or at least shouldn't, rule; what is needed here is agreement from some standard-setting body that MFI means one or the other. My impression, borne out by your query to Google scholar, is that most people use MFI to denote Mean Fluorescence Intensity. MdnFI would be an unambiguous abbreviation for Median Fluorescence Intensity (MdFI might be interpreted as either Median or Mod[al] Fluorescence Intensity). As I said before, the median is more robust than the mean. -HowardReceived on Tue Feb 19 10:58:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 31 2007 - 03:12:00 EST