Re: better filters to distinguish GFP from autofluorescence?

From: Larry W. Arnold <lwarma@med.unc.edu>
Date: Fri Dec 15 2006 - 15:41:50 EST
Chris

You are setup correctly.  However, you need to plot GFP vs 
autofluorescence (e.g.	off the PE channel) to separate the high auto 
cells from the low GFP+ cells (thee would be overlapping in a one 
parameter histogram).  Autofluorescent cells will be on a 45 degree 
line out from the "negatives" while the GFP population will be 
shifted off the 45 in the GFP direction (if GFP is on the X-axis then 
GFP+ will be shifted to the right off the 45).	You may also apply 
some compensation (PE-%GFP) to further separate.

Larry

At 05:34 AM 12/15/2006, you wrote:
>I was wondering if anyone might have advice on filter selection to 
>improve the discrimination of weak GFP expression and 
>autofluorescence.  We're using an EPICS XL with a 488 laser on 
>mammalian cell lines expressing emerald GFP (peak excitation 487 nm, 
>peak emission 509 nm).
>
>The filters we're currently using for this are a 550 dichroic 
>longpass a 525/15 bandpass.  Is there room here for improvement?
>
>Thanks,
>Chris
>
>...........................................
>Christopher Logg
>University of California, Los Angeles

Larry W. Arnold, Ph.D.
Research Professor and Director, Flow Cytometry Facility
Department of Microbiology and Immunology
CB# 7290
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Phone: 919-966-1530
FAX: 919-962-8103 
Received on Mon Dec 18 14:38:00 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 19 2006 - 03:12:07 EST