Re: K562 Cell Line Surface Markers

From: Ian Titley <Ian.Titley@icr.ac.uk>
Date: Fri Dec 15 2006 - 04:41:03 EST
Hi Fatima

If you have access to "the web" I would look at the ATCC site as this
contains quite a bit of information and references:

http://www.lgcpromochem-atcc.com/common/catalog/numSearch/numResults.cfm?atccNum=CCL-243#
26059

One of the references (Dimery IW , et al. Variation amongst K562 cell
cultures. Exp. Hematol. 11: 601-610, 1983.) heeds a note of caution, one
I would endorse from my experience of cell lines, in that even if it
says K562 on the vial it does not mean the cells will look or behave in
the same way as another vial of K562. This, to my mind, is one of the
concerns with working with cell lines. Although my understanding is that
cell lines purchased from ATCC are "true to type".

Good luck

Ian





PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF ADDRESS


Ian Titley PhD
Section of Haemato-oncology
Institute of Cancer Research
15 Cotswold Road
Belmont
Sutton
Surrey	SM2 5NG

Tel +44 (0)20 7352 8133


This email and any attachments are confidential and may be the subject

of legal privilege.  Any use, copying or disclosure other than by the 
intended recipient is unauthorised.  If you have received this message

in error, please notify the sender immediately via +44 (0) 20 7153
5134
and delete this message and any copies from your computer and network.



>>> "Fatema Legrand" <fatema.legrand@bn-immunotherapeutics.com>
13/12/2006 20:07:34 >>>
Hi everyone,

I was wondering if anyone was aware of whether the cell surface
markers
for the myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 have been characterized.

I would greatly appreciate any input you may have.


Kindest regards,

Fatema Legrand
Received on Fri Dec 15 12:18:00 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 16 2006 - 03:12:07 EST