Summary of "bacterial enumeration vs CFU" responses

From: Therese M. McGinn <tmcginn@benchmarkbiolabs.com>
Date: Wed Dec 14 2005 - 12:31:07 EST
Hello All,

 

Thank you for the helpful responses.  Here is a brief summary of the
responses for those who are interested.

 

A discrepancy between CFU and cytometric counts of bacteria is commonly
observed.  Cytometric counts are often greater than numbers of live
cells determined by traditional plating assays.  This is due to a
variety of possible factors:

	    - enumeration by flow may allow counting non-bacterial
events (noise); all buffers must be filtered to prevent this

	    - staining methods based on membrane integrity do not
indicate reproductive capacity

	    - plating efficiency is not 100%

	    - precision and accuracy of counting bead method is not 100%


 

Sincerely.

 

Terry McGinn

 

Therese M. McGinn Ph.D.

Senior Research Scientist

Benchmark Biolabs, Inc.

Phone: 402-475-8104

Fax: 402-475-8511

www.benchmarkbiolabs.com

 



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
Received on Thu Dec 15 13:18:00 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:04:00 EST