Geoffrey Lyon wrote- >I have a user that wants to investigate the properties of blasting cells. The >problem that she encounters is that when presenting data people ask if she has >performed doublet discrimination, which she cannot do because she will loose >the blasting cells. When performing doublet discrimination by FSC-A versus >SSC-A gated onto SSC-H vs. SSC-W the blasting cells appear elevated in SSC-W >with the doublets. I was wondering if anyone has figured out how to >distinguish doublets from blasting cells. Any insight would be appreciated. I'll assume for the moment we're talking about T cells. If I remember correctly (it's been a while since I worked on lymphocyte activation), the initial increase in cell volume, which occurs within a few (4-8) hours of stimulation, is not accompanied by a substantial increase in macromolecular constituents of the cell, and thus probably reflects a change in hydration state as much as anything else. At this stage of the game, one would expect increased expression of CD69. By 8-12 hours, you should see CD98 expression, and increases in both RNA content (detectable with pyronin Y using Hoechst 33342 or other DNA dyes to block pyronin binding to RNA) and mitochondrial membrane potential (probably best appreciated in this context using very low, i.e., nanomolar, concentrations of cyanine dyes). Years ago, we and others did "multiparameter" analyses of early lymphocyte activation using two or three parameters. I'm not sure that anybody has looked at the process in more detail recently, and it should be worthwhile to do so, taking advantage of the current armamentarium of reagents and of modern instruments capable of measuring eight and more parameters. I should also mention that there are other changes occurring in early lymphocyte activation that are detectable by cytometry using physical parameters such as AC impedance, multiangle scatter, and fluorescence polarization; however, these parameters are not measurable in most commercial fluorescence flow cytometers. -HowardReceived on Fri Oct 7 12:58:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:03:55 EST