Dear All We sort samples from various human tissues which may contain pathogens. We therefore need to test our aerosol containment device for efficiency of protecting the operator etc. We have used the phage/E. coli system but have had various difficulties with this. We therefore propose using the Glogerm bead method, however we have a number of issues regarding this: 1. Is it feasible to compare an aerosol with a glo-germ particle in it against an aerosol with an infectious agent in it - given that a Glo-germ particle is 5um and TB is 1-4um and HIV 0.1um. That is, will a Glo-germ aerosol accurately reflect the behaviour of an infectious aerosol and if not should this test be considered reliable? 2. For those conducting the Glo-germ test, is the Aerotech collection device (or something similar) used? If so what is it's efficiency? 3. We are hoping to get a general consensus on testing the efficiency of a containment unit for Flow sorters. Do people use The Glo-germ test, the phage test or another method? In responding to these questions one must consider that our unit is sorting samples from a general population who are not known to be infectious but may be. Also UK health and safety legislation governs that personal protection equipment should be a last resort and thus should not be considered at this stage. Many thanks for your opinions, comments etc Best wishes Ian Ian Titley PhD Section of Haemato-oncology Institute of Cancer Research 237 Fulham Road London UK SW3 6JB Tel +44 (0)20 7352 8133 Fax +44 (0)20 7352 3299Received on Thu Mar 31 13:58:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 - 22:03:41 EST