Re: BBC "documentary"

From: Adrian O Vladutiu (vladutiu@acsu.Buffalo.EDU)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 22:26:38 EST

Next message: Chance, Tim: "RE: Laser Scanning Cytometer vs Confocal"
Previous message: vbsmith@UNMC.EDU: "DNA flow Analysis"
In reply to: Mario Roederer: "BBC "documentary""
Next in thread: J.Paul Robinson: "Re: BBC "documentary""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I remember the furor in the medical literature that followed the paper of
Benveniste et al (in Nature). I do not want to criticize the former editor
of Nature (where the article was published after almost 1 year of
revisions and rigorous peer review) but the whole "affair" left a bad
taste. The paper was accepted by Nature but shortly after its publication
a "committee" of scientists, editor and a magician went to the lab to
observe the experiments. The comments of the former Editor of Nature
(mentioned by Howard Shapiro) could have been made without the committee.
I wonder whether it is of value to "open the box" again in this list.
Adrian Vladutiu

Next message: Chance, Tim: "RE: Laser Scanning Cytometer vs Confocal"
Previous message: vbsmith@UNMC.EDU: "DNA flow Analysis"
In reply to: Mario Roederer: "BBC "documentary""
Next in thread: J.Paul Robinson: "Re: BBC "documentary""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 17:41:45 EST